Strategi Kesantunan Tuturan Positif dan Negatif pada Komik Nawadir Juha Li Al-Athfal
Article Sidebar
Articles
Article Matrics :Abstract views 294 times
Total Downloaded 213 times
This article can be traced in:
DOAJ GOOGLE SCHOLAR DIMENSIONS PORTAL GARUDA BASE INDONESIA ONESEARCH MORAREFMain Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to describe the form of politeness in the comic Nawadir Juha Li al ethical. This research is qualitative descriptive research with a type of literature study. The data collection method used in this study is the listening method with note-taking techniques by recording utterances containing positive and negative politeness based on Brown and Levinson's theory. This research was carried out in three stages, first providing data; Data Analysis Stages; and data presentation stage. The results showed that of the ten negative politeness strategies according to Brown and Levinson, there were 4 strategies found in the NJLA comics, namely (1) apologizing, (2) Not giving to do act, (3) Dissociating the requester from the impingement, (4) State clearly that the interlocutor is very valuable. Of the fifteen positive politeness strategies according to Brown and Levinson, there are 7 strategies found in NJLA comics, namely (1) attending to the address, (2) exaggerating, (3) avoiding disagreement, (4) being optimistic, (5) claiming that whatever H wants, (6) asking for reasons, (7) Satisfying some of H's wants
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan bentuk kesantunan berbahasa dalam komik Nawadir Juha Li al athfal. Penelitian ini termasuk penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan jenis studi kepustakaan. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah metode simak dengan teknik catat dengan cara mencatat tuturan yang mengandung kesantunan positif dan negatif berdasarkan teori Brown dan Levinson. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dalam tiga tahapan, pertama penyediaan data; tahap analisis data; dan tahap penyajian data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dari sepuluh strategi kesantunan negatif menurut Brown dan Levinson terdapat 4 strategi yang terdapat pada komik NJLA, yaitu (1) apologizing, (2) Not giving to do act, (3) Dissociating the requester from the impingement, (4) State clearly that the interlocutor are very valuable. Dari lima belas strategi kesantunan positif menurut Brown dan Levinson terdapat 7 strategi yang terdapat pada komik NJLA, yaitu (1) attending the address,(2) exaggerating, (3) avoiding disagreement, (4) being optimistic, (5) claim that whatever H wants, (6) asking for reason, (7) Satisfying some of H’s wants.
Article Details
References
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C Levinson. “Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage.” Cambridge, 1987.
Chaer, Abdul. Kesantunan Berbahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010.
Effendy, Onong Uchjana. Dinamika Komunikasi. Bandung: Pt Remaja Rosdakarya, 2008.
Gunawan, Fahmi. “REPRESENTASI KESANTUNAN BROWN DAN LEVINSON DALAM WACANA AKADEMIK” 10, no. 1 (May 2014): 16–27.
Klein, Allen. The Healing Power of Humor: Techniques for Getting Through Loss, Setbacks, Upsets, Disappointments, Difficulties, Trials, Tribulations, and All That Not-So-Funny Stuff. 1st ed. Nashville: Broadman Press, 1989.
Maricic, Ibolya. “Cyberpoliteness: Requesting Strategies on the Linguist List.” In The 7th International Pragmatics Conference, edited by Enikö Németh, 409–16. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association (IprA), 2001.
Markhamah, and dkk. Analisis Kesalahan & Kesantunan Berbahasa. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press, 2009.
Mawaddah, Anisah Nur, and Nurul Fitriani. “STRATEGI KESANTUNAN TINDAK TUTUR POSITIF DAN NEGATIF OLEH KARAKTER DI FILM ‘LET IT SNOW’ (2019).” Inteligensi : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan 4, no. 1 (July 2021): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.33366/ilg.v4i1.2420.
Nadar, F.X. Pragmatik & Penelitian Pragmatik. Ke satu. Yogyakarta: Graha ilmu, 2009.
Pranowo. Berbahasa Secara Santun. Cetakan Kedua. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2021.
Rahardi, Kunjana. Pragmatik. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2005.
Rohmadi, Muhammad. “STRATEGI PENCIPTAAN HUMOR DENGAN PEMANFAATAN ASPEK-ASPEK KEBAHASAAN.” HUMANIORA 22, no. 3 (2010): 285–98.
Rozalia, Pita. “ANALISIS PRINSIP KERJA SAMA DAN PRINSIP KESOPANAN PADA BUKU HUMOR SEHAT KARYA PUJO RAHARJO.” Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2015.
Setiawan, Arik. “PESAN KRITIK SOSIAL DALAM KOMIK BERGENRE HUMOR DI MEDIA SOSIAL INSTAGRAM.” UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA, 2019.
Suhadi. Humor Dalam Kehidupan. Jakarta: Gema Press, 1989.
Supriyana, Asep. “Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesantunan Dalam Mengembangkan Wacana Humor.” Arkhais 11, no. 1 (June 2020): 27–32.
Syadiyah, Reghifa K., Risma H.Y. Astuti, and Firna Aprilliani. “Psikologi Positif Melalui Humor Dalam Menumbuhkan Kesehatan Mental.” Nosipakabelo: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling 2, no. 2 (2021): 68–78.
Trosborg, Anna. Interlanguage Pragmatics. DE GRUYTER MOUTON, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110885286.
Ulam, Asyifa, Emzir Emzir, and Nuruddin Nuruddin. “ANALISIS LINGUISTIK PRINSIP KERJA SAMA DALAM TUTURAN CERITA HUMOR NAWÂDIR JUHÂ LI AL-ATHFÂL.” Arabi : Journal of Arabic Studies 3, no. 2 (December 2018): 157. https://doi.org/10.24865/ajas.v3i2.84.
Wijana, I Dewa Putu. Kartun: Studi Tentang Permainan Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Ombak, 2004.
———. “Pemanfaatan Homonimi Di Dalam Humor.” Humaniora 1 (1994): 21–28.
Yule, George. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.